Showing posts with label Curating. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Curating. Show all posts

Friday, 1 March 2013

Practice on Curating (1)

Dieter Roth 



This is the day 1 for documenting the research and progress of my project on establishing a curating career from scratch.

Coming back to Asia after finishing my two years of master degree in Edinburgh, I experienced a lot of emotions that I have been prepared for, but still can't handle it very well.

The biggest one is the expectation from family members that was far different than I thought.  As soon as I came back to Taiwan, my relatives started to suggest me to do secretary-like jobs that guarantees me safe incomes and positive social status. My grandmother's biggest wish for me is to get a husband in short coming years also not to travel abroad so much as before.  My mother is hoping me to import luxury brands's products from UK, Europe to sell in Taiwan, or trying to work for any agencies as long as it's from a government organisation.

It is a strange situation that I am in, in the way I am glad that they didn't put too much expectation on the master degree I earned abroad.  What it means is that the sort of jobs that I am looking for, doesn't have to pay me tons of money, they don't expect that I am the one to support the family, but as long as it sounds like a nice job to my future husband's family.
As if to them, the biggest success is to find a good family to marry and to have a good job title.
It is not about my personal satisfaction also they strongly suggested that work isn't suppose to relate to your interest anyway, or it will always end up as a broken dream.

Sunday, 19 February 2012

C U R A F I A

This is a game workshop that I put together for the FAIR.  It will happen on 27th February and will be recorded on video. 

Right now I have been more interesting in the idea that I think we don't actually share any common knowledge in contemporary art world, but only mutual knowledge. And I think this is one of the reason that we can't not fully anticipate how to be successful in contemporary art world by following established path. 

The players of the game each held partial information, and they have to made judgement based on partial information otherwise they will be eliminate from the exhibition planning because they construct threat to the curators. 

When artists put themselves in other people's shoes, they also have to anticipate the fact that all the other people but this set of rules can or cannot being operated in a world where rationality isn't necessarily being required to be the prior elements for their social interaction. 






Friday, 28 October 2011

DUCK HEAD, DUCK AND HEAD, THAT IS.

The duck that I made in casting room photo by Boco


I just had tutorial with Neil, and we had around like 45 mins or so to talk about my plan towards my thesis.

I started with the book that Neil suggested me last time "Folk devils and Moral Panics" by Stanley Cohen.   and also with my recent develop interest in the novel "Frankenstein."  My concept is to use Frankenstein as a structure for my thesis/ novel intervention.  
through the novel and the collaboration, I want to question/ examine how the contemporary art world being shaping and the moral ethic within it.  

Frankenstein was set up in industrialisation background, when people focus on Sciences and trying to mechanising everything and so Shelly create such allegory to warn that it might ending up generating a monster.  I though of what happened now with the booming senario of creative industry.  

Frankenstein as the original novel ---> by copy/ padary/ -----> duplicate 
  • an assemblage/ collage of Flesh and different things that actually doesn't fit together. 
  • A warning for people/ monstrous 
Neil also suggested me besides to read the novel, I can also start to read some of the summery from Yorknote so that can help me to be able to see more on the structure rather being caught up by the small/ trivial plots.


Rewriting/ Folk telling/ hear-say Process 

     A rewriting process is also one of my concern since I have no intention to just quote Shelly's story and then giving an example about what happened in the contemporary art world.  NO NO NO!

so this is what i'm gonna do and what neil suggested me.

  • Donalf barthelme rewrite the folk tale "Snow White" which apparently a good writing of it. His writing has the self aware writing style thus makes you aware that you are reading it, you are being posed as an objected view.  And the speech style. 
  • Vladimir Propp -  is an russian Formalist, " The Morphology of the folk tale" examine how folk tale being transformed over time and by different people who was telling it.   Because there must be something changed due to the person who was telling it are different, there might be something missing, something being mistranslated, something being added up to... or using different words.  Retelling ---> Same---> Script.
Frankenstein in Contemporary Art World

     Questioning what this idea of assemblage and collage of different in contemporary art world. 
  • "Raising Frankenstein"was telling how curators combine different elements within CAT, and thus to generate the new meaning of it.
  • The notion of "Frankenstein Courses"
  • Working online (very common nowadays) the webpage itself is also has "frankenstein" element as there are different elements will appear on the same page as well. 



Folk Tale is also has the element of Frankenstein because it is like everyday resistance.
Most people think Frankenstein as a horrible figure/ and something horrible.
Propp---- > like everything we do (to be checked)

Methodology 

in terms of methodology, I can use retell/ examine the iconic figure as my method and to apply "folk devils and moral panics" and "Art & Fear" by Paul Vilrilio   

the spread of mouth/ hear-say.... 
  • "Art and outrageous" --- John. A. Walker : folk devil within art world such as Damien Hirst the pissed christ.  
-------> as artist build up their fame by offending people 


  • White elephant: nothing going on there.








  • A folk devil example by Neil
Occupy London as an example to see the different picture and approach from the sun and the Guardian. 

















Idea >> Creating a fake artist as a folk devil. 
  • Art&Fear " by Paul Virilio: as an allegory which apply this idea of Frankenstein a lot. 
  • we can examine artist who manipulate the body (the body as the site)
Turning harmless people to a harmful thing thus to create moral panic ----> being able to control people and manipulate people. 

In my opinion so far, I think the media is the scientist in Frankenstein who are shaping us into a monster they want and then accusing us that it is actually what we want, in doing this brain wash process, we are ending up generate different monsters and hybrid again and again. 

I also found out it is very interesting that it is always only by creating a fear/ or panic so that we will being able to act and gain public awareness. 

Neil brings up there is this notion within Nazi group the called has the notion of means of achieving happiness is to be physically fit and healthy.  This is also dealing with the notion of being pure and unpure. 

Similar example in Sweden would be Masculine christian, so most of them need to be very fit and pure. 

I also like to mention two films that I'm thinking of the engaging with 

  • Dogtooth by Giorgos Lanthimos
  • The Boss of it all by Lars Von Trier 
  • Idiots by Lars Von Trier
  • Baise Moi by  Virginie Despentes (not sure about it yet, but I m thinking this elements of experiencing twisting the whole conventional notion of female as a week role within the film. 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Nov 8


My tutorial with Angela, 


Angela reminds me to be careful that to put all the blame on "media" and I should also try to see if other  factors is part of the reason to shape the contemporary art world as a monster which being created. 


In terms of methodology, my methodology also the literary references with in "folk devils and moral panics/ Frankenstein can be my resources.  


also take a look at why we have this idea of investing in stock market could be an risky investment however it is safe to invest on art works? and who is behind this? who is creating this ideology?


It might be helpful to create a visual outline map and to help me to linear my idea on pictures. 





Wednesday, 19 October 2011

Cascade Falls ( Installation photo's and Crit)



Photo credit © Yao-Lung Cheng 
   

      To begin with the layout of the exhibition, we decided to try to make these two artists - Lindsay, Yao-Lung's work presenting a jointed relation with engaging with the representation of memories.  The space C2 is a white cube space located inside of the college, it is a room composed by the white walls as a gallery space.  The blue curtain we hang onto the window create a new landscape within the space, which I suggest to input our ideology of curtain as the stage curtain - cover what is behind the scene, or a curtain within the domestic space such as home/ private space/ restaurant/ cars as kind of implication of private/ public, be seen/ and hided from.

      As a curator of this exhibition, I would like to second several ideas and knowledge of the definition of curation, thus to discuss the role as a curator, and then I would like to talk about the artists work within the   project.  "The curator is basically in this case acting as a kind of interface between artist, institution, and audience in "the development of critical meaning in partnership and discussion with artists and publics" as Barnaby Drabble states. which curator act as a mediator, administrator and manager locate themselves within Art World, which Alloway sited as "a shifting multiple goal coalition"and it can also be regarded as an organization "a negotiating environment." Some believe that a good curator should be invisible (Burnett 2005) but the under the circumstance, contemporary curating mostly concentrates on theories of curating and can be argued to do more for the reputation of individual curators or theorists than for the sharing of curatorial skills. (Graham&Cook 2010) The history of exhibitions is one of our most culturally 'repressed.' As Mary Anne Staniszewski stressed, the contextualisation of space and its rhetoric have been overshadowed by contexualising in terms of epochs and the artists' oeuvre, despite the fact that exhibition installations have had such a crucial significance for how meaning is created in Art." (2005, 91)
     
       The exhibition layout was inspired first by both artists' work and their idea, I wanted to build up a installation layout from their meaning and things that inspired them, which I second from Graham & Cook "We believe that a good understanding of the artwork - its behaviours, processes, and cultural context - is vital starting point for all curating. (2010, 11) Lindsay's work engaging with the recreation of the non-human/ inaccessible habitat for human which were being recreated, reproduced by human being inorder to fulfill it's curiosity or to achieve something that is impossible being experience immediately or has intangible factor within it, such as past memory.

     Yao-Lung's work has two key elements within it, he arranging collected objects within the frame, and this time he presents two type of frame.  He uses ice cube and physical frames as the boundaries of his objects, or his story.  The ice cube has a dramatic effect on this space also enact within the people who were inside of the space as well. Every melting moment were participated by audiences who physically engaging with the exhibition, and people can sense its dramatically effect visually through the melting water and psychologically by the pre-exist knowledge of the science of ice.  People founds his work within the ice is giving this idea of "not wanting the edge to be defined." "can't help thinking what's going to happen when it melt --- unpredictable anticipation" with the attention of not wanting the edge to be too defined, Yao-lung's collection evoked people's imagination by using objects with shared memory (a feature of consumerism), which we can see as Ilya Kavakov who was being described simultaneously a poet of facts and a spinner of tales, in his catalogue "The Man who never threw anything away", illustrate this action as "Conceived in ideological grandeur and built on the cheap, Communism's monument were ready-made ruins, encircled, as monuments always are, by the humbler architecture of ordinary life." Not necessarily related to communism but the notion of according the objects (Time shell)  one can travel meta-physically through their past by visually absorb these little collections with differed stories.

      Lindsay's work combines two framed pictures from an aquarium in Chicago, and men-made fountain.  The fountain has a geometric shape which I located it in the middle of the room, because when the water coming out of the water nozzle contains performativity can create a kind of stage central thus make viewers to focus and being aware of.  However, the water sprung out of the fountain edge became problematic and being considered as a failure. and one of the pictures were deliberately heighten above the eye level also frustrating viewer's visibility and so did the way we displayed Yao-lung's work evoked such question.  With the cheap material and artificial colour, Disneyland, beach coma... and something that is produced deliberately to entertain people and thus they pretend to be happy .  Other two pieces on the wall can help viewers to get involved with an experience.

     The water from my point of view is a very key issue within this exhibition, I imagine the melting water, and water which sprung from the nozzle together with the dripping curtain create a coordinating format. followed by the shape of the fountain, a geometric way of displaying can be rather fit with the space and theme.  The sound of water become a distraction of the exhibition which when I was holding as a mean to engage the viewer's intention become somehow a failure or a misread attempt also state the  power of viewer and thus I thought this is a postmodern way of seeing the critics/ viewers by rotating their opinions within the room thus become a break from what happened in 60s as Alloway describe " The interpretation were being dominated pretty much bounded by the intentions of the artist, which there is a corresponding neglect of comparative and historical information (p7)" and point a direction to Duchamp were trying to propose that the function of audience is to determine the meaning of the work when it is out of the artist's hands by variable acts of "deciphering and interpreting."

     At the last, Cascade Falls ended last friday, with thanks to everyone who made it to the exhibition and the crit.  We received varies of comments and I found them highly relevant to the issue that we were trying to engage with, and from this project we founded another starting point, the power of the viewer, blurred boundary between the tangible and intangible lines, shared memory (common timespace)and thus to the interpretation from the viewer, the failure, the melancholic feeling as an aesthetic approach... to take us to different direction.